The Biden Administration is facing criticism from a British foreign policy analyst over its response to a request from a think tank for Prince Harry’s immigration records. Nile Gardiner, a former aide to the late Margaret Thatcher, has expressed concerns, describing the administration’s reply as both arrogant and dismissive of the legitimate concerns of the American public regarding immigration law enforcement.
Gardiner stressed that in the United States, the final decision regarding the release of Prince Harry’s immigration records ultimately rests with Federal Judges. He hinted at an upcoming major announcement as the case involving the Duke of Sussex unfolds.
The issue revolves around a motion filed in DC Federal Court, which seeks to compel U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CPB) and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) to expedite their response to a request for information concerning Prince Harry’s immigration status. This request has gained prominence due to allegations of the Duke’s drug use.
The Department of Homeland Security is now facing legal action concerning Prince Harry’s immigration records. The Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project is leading the charge, seeking clarity from government authorities on whether the Duke of Sussex received preferential treatment from the U.S. government.
The organization pointed to Prince Harry’s admission of being a frequent drug user in his book, “Spare.” In its complaint, the organization cited U.S. immigration law, which stipulates that individuals admitting to drug-related offenses are generally ineligible for entry, except in cases involving specific temporary waivers.
As this intriguing case unfolds, it underscores the importance of transparency and adherence to immigration laws, raising questions about how Prince Harry’s immigration status will be addressed and whether it will impact his future activities in the United States.
