Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, is under the spotlight as her alleged quest for American prestige triggers a wave of criticism. Royal correspondent Natasha Livingstone has brought this issue to the forefront, sparking a nuanced conversation about the couple’s retention of their Duke and Duchess titles, as reported in the Daily Mail.
Livingstone initiated the discussion by drawing parallels between Meghan and the Duchess of Wessex, Sophie. Despite Prince Harry and Meghan cutting numerous ties with the Royal Family, they have steadfastly clung to their prestigious titles. Livingstone contends that these titles offer the couple a level of esteem and deference in America that would be elusive with a more commonplace “Mr. and Mrs. Windsor” designation.
The heart of the matter revolves around the perceived incongruity between the couple’s high-profile life in California and the traditional ideals of selfless duty and service associated with their royal titles. While Harry has asserted that relinquishing the titles would bear no consequence, there is a growing sentiment among observers that it might be time for the couple to reconsider, given the apparent disparity.
The controversy has intensified against the backdrop of Sophie Wessex’s recent trip to Colombia for a British Council center in Cali, which went relatively unnoticed due to a lack of media coverage. This pattern extends to her previous visits to Canada and Ethiopia, raising questions about the diverging levels of attention given to different members of the Royal Family.
As the debate around Meghan and Harry’s titles unfolds, it becomes a focal point for discussions on their roles, responsibilities, and the evolving dynamics within the Royal Family. The couple finds themselves navigating a delicate balance between their pursuit of a life outside traditional royal norms and the expectations associated with their prominent titles. The ongoing scrutiny highlights the complexities surrounding their public image and the challenges of straddling two worlds.
