We acknowledge the significance of your online privacy and acknowledge that granting us permission to collect some personal information requires a great deal of trust. We seek this consent as it enables Distinct Post to offer a platform that amplifies the voices of the marginalized. By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Distinct PostDistinct Post
Aa
  • Home
  • Israel-Gaza Conflict
  • World
  • Entertainment
  • Style
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Royals
Reading: ICJ to give its verdict on Ukraine-Russia ‘terrorism’ case
Share
Aa
Distinct PostDistinct Post
  • Home
  • Israel-Gaza Conflict
  • World
  • Entertainment
  • Style
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Royals
Search
  • Home
  • Israel-Gaza Conflict
  • World
  • Entertainment
  • Style
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Royals
Follow US
Distinct Post > World > Europe > ICJ to give its verdict on Ukraine-Russia ‘terrorism’ case
icj-to-give-its-verdict-on-ukraine-russia-terrorism-case
Europe

ICJ to give its verdict on Ukraine-Russia ‘terrorism’ case

Henry Ortiz Published January 31, 2024
SHARE

The United Nations’ top court, ICJ, will hand down its verdict on Friday in a case brought by Ukraine against Russia for alleged “terrorism financing” and “racial discrimination” after its annexation of Crimea in 2014.

Kyiv has accused Moscow of being a “terrorist state” whose support for pro-Russian separatists in eastern Ukraine was a harbinger of the full-fledged 2022 invasion.

It wants Russia to compensate all civilians caught up in the conflict, as well as victims from Malaysia Airlines flight MH17, which was shot down over eastern Ukraine.

The case predates Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) will decide on Friday whether it has jurisdiction to rule in a separate case over that war.

Russia is also in the dock for alleged breaches of an international convention on racial discrimination due to its treatment of the Tatar minority and Ukrainian speakers in occupied Crimea.

REMINDER: the #ICJ will deliver its Judgment on the merits in the case #Ukraine v. #Russia tomorrow, Wednesday 31 January 2024, at 3 p.m. (The Hague). The sitting will be broadcast live on @UNWebTV here: https://t.co/ktuwjuwOtH

— CIJ_ICJ (@CIJ_ICJ) January 30, 2024

During hearings on the case, Alexander Shulgin, Russia’s ambassador to the Netherlands, accused Ukraine of “blatant lies and false accusations… even to this court”.

Top Ukrainian diplomat Anton Korynevych retorted that Russia was trying to “wipe us off the map”.

“Beginning in 2014, Russia illegally occupied Crimea and then engaged in a campaign of cultural erasure, taking aim at ethnic Ukrainians and Crimean Tatars,” said Korynevych.

The case started in 2017 and has seen lengthy exchanges in the ICJ’s Great Hall of Justice, plus thousands of pages of documents submitted to the judges.

It is part of a strategy of “lawfare” waged by Ukraine against its adversary that has also seen it drag Moscow to court over maritime law and alleged human rights abuses.

PRESS RELEASE: the #ICJ will deliver its Judgment on the preliminary objections raised by the Russian Federation in the case #Ukraine v. #Russia: 32 States intervening on Friday 2 February 2024 at 3 p.m. (The Hague) https://t.co/R7fO96N5ph. Watch the sitting live on @UNWebTV pic.twitter.com/GUsOJM29nR

— CIJ_ICJ (@CIJ_ICJ) January 29, 2024

In 2017, the ICJ rejected Kyiv’s initial request for emergency measures to halt Russia’s funding of separatists.

The judges found Ukraine had “not put before the court evidence which affords a sufficient basis” to show funds from Moscow were used “to cause death or serious bodily harm to a civilian”.

However, it did order Moscow to refrain from imposing “limitations” on the Crimean Tatars or the use of Ukrainian on the peninsula.

The ICJ, based in The Hague, rules on disputes between states and is often confused with the International Criminal Court (ICC), which prosecutes war crimes by individuals.

Its rulings are final and cannot be subject to appeal but it has little power to enforce them.

For example, it issued an emergency ruling ordering Russia to halt its invasion one month after tanks rolled over the border — to no avail.

You Might Also Like

Volodymyr Zelenskyy says grateful for Donald Trump’s ‘strong resolve’ to end war in Ukraine

Ukrainian flag appears on big screen during Vladimir Putin visit to Kazakhstan’s Astana

DHL cargo plane crashes into a two-story home in Lithuania, killing one

Ukraine will lose if the US cuts military funding: President Volodymyr Zelenskyy

Russia escalated the Ukraine conflict by deploying North Korean troops: US

Henry Ortiz January 31, 2024 January 31, 2024
Popular News
china-sanctions-us-firm-kharon-a-data-provider-related-to-xinjiang
ChinaUnited States

China sanctions US firm Kharon, a data provider related to Xinjiang

Claire Martin Claire Martin December 27, 2023
Timothée Chalamet Dazzles on SNL: A Night of Laughter, Music, and Versatility
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Dodge Another South Park Roast, But Public Image Still in Jeopardy
Twitter Pulls Out of EU’s Disinformation Code, Faces Impending Compliance with New Laws
Jeff Bezos becomes world’s richest man, dethrones Elon Musk

Categories

  • Market
  • Tech
  • Fitness
  • Food
  • Celebrity
  • Fashion
  • Beauty
  • Football
  • Cricket
  • Entertainment
    • Celebrity
    • Movies
    • Television
  • Style
    • Arts
    • Beauty
    • Fashion
  • Health
    • Fitness
    • Food
  • Sports
    • Baseball
    • Basketball
    • Cricket
    • Football
    • Olympics
  • Business
    • Market
    • Tech
Useful Links
  • About us
  • Privacy policy
  • Term Of Use

2023 © Distinct Post News & Media. All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?