The new biographical film Michael (2026), based on the life of global superstar Michael Jackson, has sparked intense debate among critics, with many calling it a “whitewash” and a “sanitised” portrayal of the King of Pop.
Directed by Antoine Fuqua and produced with the support of Jackson’s estate, the film focuses heavily on his rise to fame, iconic performances, and musical legacy—but has drawn criticism for what it leaves out.
Jaafar Jackson’s Performance Wins Praise
One of the most widely praised aspects of the film is the performance by Jaafar Jackson, who plays his uncle on screen.
Critics describe his portrayal as “uncanny,” emotionally engaging, and physically convincing, with strong attention to Jackson’s iconic dance style and stage presence.
Despite the controversy surrounding the film, many reviewers agree that Jaafar Jackson carries the emotional and visual weight of the story.
A Biopic Focused on Music, Not the Full Story
The film follows Michael Jackson’s journey from the Jackson 5 era to global superstardom, using his original vocals for musical sequences including hits like Thriller, Billie Jean, and Beat It.
However, critics note that the film avoids deeper exploration of his later life controversies, including widely reported allegations that have long surrounded the singer.
Some reviews suggest the film ends its timeline before those events fully unfold, creating what critics describe as a selective version of his life story.
Critics Call It “Whitewashed” and “Sanitised”
Several major reviews have been sharply critical:
- Some describe the film as a “soulless cash grab”
- Others call it a “glossy but hollow recreation of fame”
- A number of critics say it avoids the most difficult and controversial aspects of Jackson’s life
One review argues that the film “strips away humanity in favour of a polished music montage,” while another calls it “a 127-minute trailer of greatest hits moments.”
Music and Performance Still Stand Out
Despite criticism, most reviewers agree on one point: the music is the film’s strongest asset.
The performance sequences are described as energetic, emotionally powerful, and visually impressive, often recreating some of Jackson’s most iconic live moments.
For fans, these scenes remain the main reason the film works.
Mixed Reception Overall
While some critics praise the film as a nostalgic celebration of Jackson’s legacy, others argue it feels incomplete and overly controlled by image management and estate influence.
The result is a deeply divided reception—between those who see it as a tribute, and those who see it as an incomplete biography.
Final Verdict
Michael (2026) is a visually polished and musically powerful biopic, anchored by a strong performance from Jaafar Jackson.
However, its selective storytelling and avoidance of controversy have made it one of the most debated music biopics in recent years.
Rating: ★★½ – ★★★☆☆ (2.5–3/5)
